Sometimes, due to poor quality of television programs, and thanks to the disrespectful, conceited and obnoxious gossip programs for content absolutely childish and unnecessary for a country whose mental state should be healthy, we find that this "triad" of fundamental rights emerge today. So you should know what they are:
RIGHT TO HONOR: Honor as an object of the right enshrined in Art. 18.1 SC, is a vague legal concept whose definition depends on the standards, values \u200b\u200band social ideas at every moment, and hence the courts have some discretion when specify in each case to be taken by adversely affecting the fundamental right that protects it. This protects the reputation of a person, protecting against expressions or messages that may detract from it into consideration when going outside in disrepute or contempt or to be taken in public by outrageous concept.
RIGHT TO PRIVACY: Recognized by the art. 18.1 SC is to ensure the individual a reserved area of \u200b\u200byour life, linked to respect for their dignity as a person (art. 10.1 CE), compared to action and knowledge of others, be they public authorities or private individuals. So that the right to privacy gives its owner the power to protect the reserved area, not only personal but also familiar, compared to the disclosure by third parties and unwanted publicity
RIGHT TO OWN IMAGE: The configured as a right of personality, derived from human dignity and aims to protect the moral dimension of persons, which gives its holder a right to determine the graphic information generated by their personal physical features that can be publicly available. The authority granted by this right as a fundamental right, is essentially to prevent the acquisition, reproduction or publication of the image itself by an unauthorized third party, whatever the purpose - informative, commercial, scientific, cultural aims to safeguard a proper and reserved, but not intimate, compared to action and knowledge of others, a level needed to decide freely on the development of the personality and, ultimately, an area needed by the standards of our culture to maintain a minimum quality of human life.
Do these rights have limits? Of course I have, especially when exercising other fundamental rights equally fundamental, such as freedom of expression it manifested in the law to report by the media freely, subject only to respect the aforementioned rights fundamental. So we're all friends, right? Obviously not. Legal fringes are absolute, sometimes in excess and some by default, there really is a significant loophole. By this I mean to the law that protects these rights is from 1982 and conceived for a particular historical moment that, today, I think obsolete. But that will be "another matter" for another post in my blog. At the moment, to know what is meant by "Honor, Privacy and Self-image" is more than enough
