Buena pregunta para empezar este foro, ¿verdad?, pero, ¿lo es no what is it? ...
This legal issue is giving more of a headache, for obvious reasons, the record companies, film studios and companies in the game, basically.
The actual event is limited to know whether an action such as "natural" as downloading music or other software programs via p2p (file-sharing networks among pc 's connected) can lead to criminal consequences.
What does the Criminal Code about?
Article 270.
be punished with imprisonment from six months to two years and a fine of 12 to 24 months who, profit to the detriment of third parties, reproduce, plagiarize, distribute or communicate publicly all or in part, a literary, artistic or scientific work or its transformation, artistic performance fixed in any medium or communicated by any means, without the consent of holders of relevant intellectual property rights or their assigns.
crime The key lies in the expression "nonprofit", so if file sharing is done without payment, NOT A CRIME. Sorry for the gentlemen the SGAE and other vagrants, criminals and unsavory characters, but if no fresh little money at stake is not a crime.
is important to say about the whole case (set of statements on a given subject) noted the need to change the interpretation of "profit" because if exchanged files are capable of economic assessment, Like the fact possess, represent an enrichment ... but until that happens, wear your programs P2P (ares, emule, etc) without fear.
In the near future I'll talk about what is meant by "private copying" and why not! the famous canon
0 comments:
Post a Comment