occasion of the celebration of 30 years after the approval of the referendum on the English of the time said a resounding YES, including Catalan and Basque, to our current constitution, many politicians and political spokesmen, building the institutional chaos we live, the absence of values, feelings and projects have begun to send messages to the public on the need to reform the 1978 Constitution.
far so may appear normal, except for one curious detail, that all those voices in unison date expiration date of our charter in yesterday, they forget to indicate which part of the Standard Basic require a modification . I am sure this lack of specificity is not a slip or something like that but rather would be an improper heater irresponsible politicians who live day and day and are unable to offer a better project than today.
A constitution as such, is a law that may be enacted, amended or repealed as if they were of a higher law. Keep in mind that the constitutions are the rules within a country and to modify a short article could, safely, having to modify dozens of laws.
On the other hand, we should seek a final effect to the amendment. That is, the realization of the goal of constitutional reform, an objective that, today, can not be said to be consensual and even less that any possibility of arriving there. Explain why:
1 º Because there is no clear pattern of state. We do not know if we centralist ... well we do know, we are not, or if we are a federal country. Apparently, we have treated a model of a federation of territories, but the fact that sovereignty rests with the people and not the soil, breaks down the possibility. The principle of autonomy was invented to quell nationalist Basque Country, Catalonia and Navarra (Galicia, as today, did not look anything), creating a model of division of powers, which apparently seen, seems not to have served its purpose theoretical , that of bringing the administration to the citizen.
far so may appear normal, except for one curious detail, that all those voices in unison date expiration date of our charter in yesterday, they forget to indicate which part of the Standard Basic require a modification . I am sure this lack of specificity is not a slip or something like that but rather would be an improper heater irresponsible politicians who live day and day and are unable to offer a better project than today.
A constitution as such, is a law that may be enacted, amended or repealed as if they were of a higher law. Keep in mind that the constitutions are the rules within a country and to modify a short article could, safely, having to modify dozens of laws.
On the other hand, we should seek a final effect to the amendment. That is, the realization of the goal of constitutional reform, an objective that, today, can not be said to be consensual and even less that any possibility of arriving there. Explain why:
1 º Because there is no clear pattern of state. We do not know if we centralist ... well we do know, we are not, or if we are a federal country. Apparently, we have treated a model of a federation of territories, but the fact that sovereignty rests with the people and not the soil, breaks down the possibility. The principle of autonomy was invented to quell nationalist Basque Country, Catalonia and Navarra (Galicia, as today, did not look anything), creating a model of division of powers, which apparently seen, seems not to have served its purpose theoretical , that of bringing the administration to the citizen.
Given this diagnosis, and put a constitutional amendment, would correspond to establish once and how we organize our country. But according to criteria of efficiency, rather than political criteria. It is clear that at this point is absolutely impossible to reach an agreement because the privileges of some autonomous communities, whose cast into seats election is absolutely unfair, would be impossible to reform, as well, especially the poor regional communities, such as Castilla La Mancha, Extremadura and Andalusia, which based its workforce and economic flow in the grant, civil service and perks, would become useless any regression of powers to the central administration, if necessary.
2 ° Because there are no political figures in transition. Neither is Adolfo Suárez Mariano Rajoy, Zapatero and Felipe González, much less is Carrillo Llamazares, and Artur Mas / "Pepe" Montilla are Miquel Roca. Those venerable politicians of the Transition to the story are at the height of the parliamentary end of the nineteenth century and the early days of the Second Republic, have been occurred in their subjects for political and moral and political weight as significantly lower to make us think they can drive the boat for constitutional reform to a port as secure as is the Constitution of 1978.
3 ° Because the objectives of each party are impossible and common goals have declined to ostracism. Back to total centralization and more pointless with 44 million inhabitants. Federalism as we understand nationalist Socialist Party of Catalonia and Euskadi (subertir capable of reform in parliamentary terms) would only enhance the differences between communities, increase the number of officers and sponsor a lawless regime Taifa from the point of view of efficiency.
4 º Because to achieve the goals that any liberal democracy like ours French court, justice, equality and fraternity, does not require a constitutional amendment. Only requires the reform of the organic laws governing important matters such as education, which still belongs to the national parliament to legislate for 50% of common subjects or modification of the general electoral system so that the ratio -votos/escaños- corresponds to the general will, by providing appropriate, a single constituency, as is the case with the European elections, which are, incidentally, the only reliably reflected by parties representing the españolitos voted on foot.
This put examples easy to understand, that other "if any Hayles" (rivers, sanitation, public investment, security, external representation, ect)
So my opinion with the current situation in Spain, I do not see any reforms recommended and less without knowing where we are driving. But certainly I am in favor of new laws that goes into the current constitutional framework, to promote the brotherhood of people, because of land and is responsible for the topography, with administrations that work on equality and above all, effective at the real problems citizenship. I do not care that the window of the administration for the pay the Board, the Central Government, the council (which is a deputation? What good?), Or town hall. What I want is for the window work, manage my body and fix my problem. And if the official I serve, has approved an opposition of free competition and equal to those who did not get the job, instead of being a friend / brother / cousin / acquaintance / lover of a politician who heads the administration in question ... BETTER THAN BEST!
2 ° Because there are no political figures in transition. Neither is Adolfo Suárez Mariano Rajoy, Zapatero and Felipe González, much less is Carrillo Llamazares, and Artur Mas / "Pepe" Montilla are Miquel Roca. Those venerable politicians of the Transition to the story are at the height of the parliamentary end of the nineteenth century and the early days of the Second Republic, have been occurred in their subjects for political and moral and political weight as significantly lower to make us think they can drive the boat for constitutional reform to a port as secure as is the Constitution of 1978.
3 ° Because the objectives of each party are impossible and common goals have declined to ostracism. Back to total centralization and more pointless with 44 million inhabitants. Federalism as we understand nationalist Socialist Party of Catalonia and Euskadi (subertir capable of reform in parliamentary terms) would only enhance the differences between communities, increase the number of officers and sponsor a lawless regime Taifa from the point of view of efficiency.
4 º Because to achieve the goals that any liberal democracy like ours French court, justice, equality and fraternity, does not require a constitutional amendment. Only requires the reform of the organic laws governing important matters such as education, which still belongs to the national parliament to legislate for 50% of common subjects or modification of the general electoral system so that the ratio -votos/escaños- corresponds to the general will, by providing appropriate, a single constituency, as is the case with the European elections, which are, incidentally, the only reliably reflected by parties representing the españolitos voted on foot.
This put examples easy to understand, that other "if any Hayles" (rivers, sanitation, public investment, security, external representation, ect)
So my opinion with the current situation in Spain, I do not see any reforms recommended and less without knowing where we are driving. But certainly I am in favor of new laws that goes into the current constitutional framework, to promote the brotherhood of people, because of land and is responsible for the topography, with administrations that work on equality and above all, effective at the real problems citizenship. I do not care that the window of the administration for the pay the Board, the Central Government, the council (which is a deputation? What good?), Or town hall. What I want is for the window work, manage my body and fix my problem. And if the official I serve, has approved an opposition of free competition and equal to those who did not get the job, instead of being a friend / brother / cousin / acquaintance / lover of a politician who heads the administration in question ... BETTER THAN BEST!
0 comments:
Post a Comment