Friday, September 4, 2009

Free Johnny The Homicidal Maniac

LEGAL WE HAVE THE BIG PICTURE

Building the summer, beyond the break and disconnection gives you avoid work, I had more time than usual to worry, or rather, to view with concern the poor state which is the English legal system, unworthy of being called as a system of "justice."

And I see, with some chagrin that our courts suffer from a cancer beyond their own ills. Its pollution and ineffectiveness for some issues, shows that something is wrong with our country, so far as to subvert the judiciary.

note with sadness that the political tensions, the frontism frontism the cainismo patriotism and lust for power of one another, sometimes without the legitimacy of a social representation expands, regardless of votes or affiliates, is reaching own institutions that articulate a country like ours.

I am overwhelmed with sadness that bodies such as the Fiscal Council is unable to issue a report and legal-reform on the Abortion Law because the prosecutors themselves are divided on political views, when his work is defense, at any cost, legally. I resent very much that when they try cases of political corruption, the first thing that stands out is the political suit judges responsible for the investigation of the alleged crime and that the decisions of these are not interpreted in the legal code, but in political terms . I stirred the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), is a tentacle over some alleged majorities or minorities that are characterized precisely by the instability in their support.

However, what makes you want me spitting toads and pests is the most important of all courts. I refer to the Constitutional Court, which is neither court nor unfortunately is constitutional. It is a body of twelve "judges, chosen by politicians, whose merits are cronyism, submission and servility which may offer better perks. Three years

three, waiting for the Judgement of the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia. A Judgement and useless, shameful not to have been published and illustrates that the least is the law and its constitutionality, but ombliguera partisanship that sees beyond itself, even if it means to ride roughshod all existing regulatory organization.

However, there is something worse and further discredits our TC. Is its inability to impose its own criteria. No matter what will be the result. It is immaterial whether the statute will be constitutional or not, because whatever happens, those who are favorable to it, apply it without compunction. And if unemployment rampant, the denial of black economic evidence and the changing trends in publishing that have generated all Prisa for pay DTT, causes those who are against the Statute aúpen to power, they make every effort to derogate.

And all with the connivance of a TC, the first article of the Law on (LO 2 / 1979. 3 October), states: " The Constitutional Court, as supreme interpreter of the Constitution, independent of other constitutional bodies and subordinate only to the Constitution and this Charter . "

What a pity!

Publicidad por tu blog con Boosterblog
directorio de weblogs. bitadir

0 comments:

Post a Comment